Rice Price Stabilization: Government Solution to Overcome Market Failure and Improve Farmers' Welfare in Indonesia

Authors

  • Mukti Wibowo Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia Author
  • Imahda Khori Furqon Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31313/swgt5281

Keywords:

Rice price stabilization, Government intervention, Farmers' welfare

Abstract

Background: Rice prices in Indonesia often fluctuate due to market failures, such as weak bargaining power of farmers and the dominance of middlemen in the distribution chain. These conditions disadvantage farmers and highlight the importance of government intervention to stabilize prices and improve farmer welfare.

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the role of government intervention in stabilizing rice prices as an effort to address market failures and enhance farmer welfare in Indonesia.

Methods: This study employs a literature review approach by examining various scholarly sources, policy documents, and previous research related to floor price policies, agricultural input subsidies, the strengthening of buffer institutions, and the development of agricultural infrastructure.

Results: The findings indicate that floor price policies provide minimum price guarantees for farmers. Agricultural input subsidies reduce production costs and increase yields. In addition, buffer institutions such as Bulog and farmer cooperatives play a crucial role in absorbing harvests and maintaining supply stability. The development of agricultural infrastructure also contributes significantly to distribution efficiency and increased productivity.

Conclusions: Integrated and consistent government intervention is essential to create a fair, sustainable, and farmer-oriented agricultural ecosystem. Strengthening price policies, improving subsidy effectiveness, and enhancing agricultural infrastructure and institutional capacity are key strategies to support long-term agricultural resilience.

Research Contribution: This study contributes by providing a comprehensive synthesis of various forms of government intervention in rice price stabilization and emphasizing the importance of an integrated policy approach to address market failures and improve farmer welfare in Indonesia.

References

Abidin, M. Z. (2015). Dampak kebijakan impor beras dan ketahanan pangan dalam perspektif kesejahteraan sosial. Sosio Informa. https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v1i3.168

Agus Cahyono, E., Hartono, A., & Sutomo. (2019). Literatur review: Panduan penulisan dan penyusunan. Jurnal Keperawatan.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Statistik Indonesia 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Bmt, A. P., & Lerang, G. (2022). Analisis aktor kinerja ekonomi publik dan kebijakan ekonomi negara perspektif syariah. Islamic Economic and Business Journal.

Habibi, M. (2022). Capitalism and agrarian change: Class, production and reproduction in Indonesia. Routledge.

Haq, M. N. (2022). Evaluation of Perum Bulog's Performance in Controlling Rice Prices in Sinjai Regency. Income Journal Of Economics Development, 2(2), 63-70.

Isharyanto, I. (2018). Penetapan harga eceran tertinggi komoditas pangan sebagai hak konstitusional dalam perspektif negara kesejahteraan. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1534

Itang, I. (2017). Kebijakan pemerintah dalam menanggulangi kenaikan harga. Jurnal Keislaman, Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan.

Jati, K. (2019). The role of mass communications to the market interventions of rice commodity in Indonesia (Peran komunikasi massa terhadap intervensi pasar komoditas beras di Indonesia). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik. https://doi.org/10.22212/jekp.v9i2.990

Juihardi. (2023). Analisis kebijakan impor beras terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan petani di Indonesia. Inovasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan dan Manajemen.

Mamoriska, S., Cahyaningsih, E., & Hidayat, M. G. (2020). Reposisi BULOG dalam rencana pembentukan Badan Pangan Nasional. Pangan.

Mazzucato, M. (2024). Governing the economics of the common good: from correcting market failures to shaping collective goals. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 27(1), 1-24.

Muttaqin, H. (2012). Relasi agama dan modernitas: Menggugat teori sekularisasi. Jurnal Sosiologi Islam.

Nia, I., & Daud, D. (2023). Analisis faktor-faktor penyebab kegagalan pasar dan campur tangan pemerintah. Zabags International Journal of Economy. https://doi.org/10.61233/zijec.v1i1.31

Purwaningrat, L., Novianti, T., & Dermoredjo, S. K. (2020). Dampak penerapan agreed export tonnage scheme (AETS) terhadap kesejahteraan petani karet Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Karet. https://doi.org/10.22302/ppk.jpk.v37i2.641

Raihan, A. (2023). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation strategies, and mitigation options in the socio-economic and environmental sectors. Journal of Environmental Science and Economics, 2(3), 36-58.

Reza, V. (2021). Kegagalan pasar (market failure). Jurnal IndraTech.

Segati, A. (2021). Ekonomi publik dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Khazanah Ulum Ekonomi Syariah (JKUES). https://doi.org/10.56184/jkues.v5i2.135

Tsoulfidis, L. (2024). The Structure of the Neoclassical Theory. In Competing Schools of Economic Thought: Retrospect and Prospect (pp. 191-221). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Wahyudi, K. D. (2018). Kebijakan strategis usaha pertanian dalam rangka peningkatan produksi dan pengentasan kemiskinan. Majalah Ilmiah Dian Ilmu. https://doi.org/10.37849/midi.v11i2.15

Zebua, D. I. (2022). Efektivitas penggunaan media pembelajaran audiovisual pada mata kuliah ekonomi publik. Edukasi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2874

Downloads

Published

2026-04-04

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article because no new data were created or analyzed in this study.